My Useless Contribution to the GNU C Sine Function
Have you ever wondered how computers calculate trigonometric functions like sin
and cos
? Because CPUs can only do basic arithmetic, I always guessed that these functions were implemented using the Taylor Series. I recently decided to dive into the glibc (GNU C Library) source code to verify my theory. While reading the code I noticed some small improvements I could make. This article discusses the changes I merged into glibc and the background knowledge required to understand them.
Taylor Series Review
A Taylor Series lets you approximate any differentiable function as a polynomial. This polynomial approximation becomes increasingly accurate as you include more terms in it. Every Taylor Series also has a center point and the approximation becomes less accurate for values further from the center. All the Taylor approximations in the figure below are centered around 0.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6afc7/6afc771c8f6984e3ff80ee370f763025d99548ef" alt="Example Groups in Quick Splits."
Below is the Taylor Series expansion for a general function f(x)
around the center point b
, which can be proved via integration-by-parts.
Figure 1: $$ f(x) = f(b) + f’(b)\frac{(x-b)^1}{1!} + f’’(b)\frac{(x-b)^2}{2!} + f’’’(b)\frac{(x-b)^3}{3!}+\dotsb \newline = \sum_{k=0}^\infty f^{\left(k\right)}(b)\frac{(x-b)^k}{k!} $$
We can use Figure 1 to get the following expansion for the sin
function centered around 0.
Figure 2: $$ sin(x) = x - \frac{x^3}{3!} + \frac{x^5}{5!} - \frac{x^7}{7!} + \frac{x^9}{9!} \dotsb $$
glibc Sine Implementation
If you jump into the s_sin.c file prior to my change, you’ll see a comment saying the code implements the following variation of the sin
Taylor expansion.
Figure 3: $$ a - \frac{a^3}{3!} + \frac{a^5}{5!} - \frac{a^7}{7!} + \frac{a^9}{9!} + d_a\frac{(1-a^2)}{2} $$
This is exactly what we have in Figure 2, except with the mysterious $d_a\frac{(1-a^2)}{2}$ term at the end. I’ll attempt to explain what $d_a$ is and where this last term comes from.
The glibc sine implementation reinterprets its input x
as $x=a+d_a$, where $d_a$ is a small number on the order of $10^{-19}$. This technique of expressing one 64-bit value as the sum of two 64-bit values is known as double-double arithmetic. It is a common technique for emulating higher precision when you only have 64-bit primitives to work with. The implementation needs higher precision to combat the rounding errors that compound with each arithmetic operation of the Taylor Series.
Let’s verify the last term $d_a\frac{(1-a^2)}{2}$ for ourselves by plugging $a+d_a$ into the formula in Figure 2. We only need to include $d_a$ in the first 2 terms of the expansion because at higher powers the effect of $d_a$ becomes negligible. Because we are calculating the effect of $d_a$ algebraically and then including it at the end, this ensures $d_a$ doesn’t get wiped out by later floating point arithmetic.
Figure 4: $$ sin(a+d_a) \approx a+d_a - \frac{(a+d_a)^3}{3!} + \frac{a^5}{5!} - \frac{a^7}{7!} + \frac{a^9}{9!} $$
After expanding via Wolfram Alpha and simplifying we get the relationship below.
Figure 5: $$ sin(a+d_a) \approx a - \frac{a^3}{3!} + \frac{a^5}{5!} - \frac{a^7}{7!} + \frac{a^9}{9!} + (d_a-\frac{a^2d_a}{2}-\frac{ad_a^2}{2}-\frac{d_a^3}{6}) $$
We can drop $\frac{ad_a^2}{2}$ and $\frac{d_a^3}{6}$ because they are higher powers of the tiny value $d_a$, so the last term in Figure 5 simplifies to $d_a-\frac{a^2d_a}{2}$. This is different from the term $d_a\frac{(1-a^2)}{2}$ that is included in the comment. If you look at the source code, you’ll see the TAYLOR_SIN macro actually computes our version $d_a-\frac{a^2d_a}{2}$ when evaluating the Taylor Series. So it appears the comment isn’t correct.
It’s also strange how the TAYLOR_SIN macro code below seems to assume a
always equals x
because it calculates $a^3$ by multiplying xx
(which is $x^2$) and a
. You can identity the $a^3$ term by looking for which term has the leading coefficient s1
, which is the pre-computed value for $-\frac{1}{3!}$. You’ll also see that a
is indeed equal to x
if you check the TAYLOR_SIN macro’s only callsite.
/* Helper macros to compute sin of the input values. */
#define POLYNOMIAL2(xx) ((((s5 * (xx) + s4) * (xx) + s3) * (xx) + s2) * (xx))
#define POLYNOMIAL(xx) (POLYNOMIAL2 (xx) + s1)
/* The computed polynomial is a variation of the Taylor series expansion for
sin(a):
a - a^3/3! + a^5/5! - a^7/7! + a^9/9! + (1 - a^2) * da / 2
The constants s1, s2, s3, etc. are pre-computed values of 1/3!, 1/5! and so
on. The result is returned to LHS. */
#define TAYLOR_SIN(xx, a, da) \
({ \
double t = ((POLYNOMIAL (xx) * (a) - 0.5 * (da)) * (xx) + (da)); \
double res = (a) + t; \
res; \
})
Now that you have seen and understand all the relevant code, here is a summary of the 2 changes I merged into glibc.
- Update the comment to include the correct last term $d_a-\frac{a^2d_a}{2}$
- Make it clear that the TAYLOR_SIN macro actually expects
x
as the second parameter by renaminga
→x
(and similarlyda
→dx
). Also update the formula in the macro’s documentation to reflect this.
I admit these contributions were pointless because neither of them actually introduce a behavior change in the library. But hopefully you learned something by reading this post and find the glibc source code a little more approachable.
Closing Thoughts
After trying to wrap my head around the glibc math library, I have a lot of newfound respect for its creators and maintainers. I wasn’t aware that so many advanced numerical computing techniques were needed to accurately compute basic math functions. I’m still surprised that my change was actually accepted by a widely-used core systems library. Working on this was a lot of fun because it required uniting concepts from calculus and computer architecture. I hope to make more open source contributions in the future.
I’d also like to thank Siddhesh Poyarekar and Paul Zimmermann for answering all my glibc questions and reviewing my code.